National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) webinar talks about gaining trust in Advanced Air Mobility
The issue of building public acceptance and trust when it comes to Advanced Air Mobility was discussed in a webinar organised by the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA).
The organisation helps companies which rely on general aviation aircraft to help make their businesses more efficient, productive and successful. It represents more than 11,000 companies and professionals, and provides more than 100 products and services to the business aviation community, including the NBAA Business Aviation Convention & Exhibition, the world’s largest civil aviation trade show.
The panel of speakers for this webinar, held on 4th September, were Anna Dietrich, Co-Executive Director of the Community Advanced Mobility Initiative (CAMI), Shawn Hall, Chief Commercial Officer of Signature Aviation, Mike Whitaker, Head of Global Policy in Hyundai Motor Group’s Urban Air Mobility Division, Uber Air’s Launch Manager Megan Prichard and Selena Shilad, Executive Director of Alliance for Aviation Across America.
Moderating the discussion was Paul McDuffee, Vice Chairman of the NBAA’s Emerging Technologies Committee. He began by saying: “There has been a lot written about the future of advanced air mobility and those in the industry are really beginning to get a clearer picture of exactly what is needed to take place, so we can get where we want to be with this technology.
“You could assume, at first glance, that the prospects of having a reliable, available, economic and convenient transportation system that substitutes traditional ground-based mobility would be pretty popular.
“In an essence, it is. However, there is a new and emerging elephant in the room and that is whatever we need to do to try to gain the level of public acceptance needed to make this successful.”
McDuffee added that after reading a report from the Journal of Air Transport Management, he revealed about one third of the USA’s population would be ‘interested or motivated’ to fly in an air mobility vehicle. This percentage goes down further when autonomy is mentioned.
Starting off the discussion, he asked the panel what they thought were the biggest concerns from a public standpoint that might prevent the advancement of air mobility.
Dietrich said: “I think there is a lot of education you have to get through before you get to what you would consider a concern that you can actually address. People are concerned about this [Advanced Air Mobility] because they don’t understand it yet.
“It’s something that isn’t integrated into their lives. So concerns about this, how it is going to impact their personal life, the benefits, are all fundamental questions that people need to work through and get good answers for, before you get to the more practical ones.”
Hall and Whitaker agreed on these points, with Hall adding: “This is a lesson we learnt at Ubercopter. We who live and breathe aviation think about it differently than the general populous. To hear those numbers that Paul mentioned, I’m really not surprised.
“At Ubercopter we were all surprised by the amount of education that we had to do for the public for them to understand what we were trying to do with the copter. The thought you could leave the southern part of Manhattan and get to JFK Airport in seven and a half minutes via a mode of transportation that you’re not used to, and that’s a helicopter!
“If you layer on an eVTOL or some other form of Advanced Air Mobility on top of that, we have a long way to go to educate the general public on exactly what we want to try and do.”
Whittaker said: “I think we’re on the right track with education. People are leary about flying; when you’re driving a car it’s a different thing — you feel safe in your own hands but in an airplane you lose that control and introduce autonomy into the situation. We have to prove that we are worthy of that trust.
“We’re still a way away from that, but as technology develops and we start to engage in flight testing and it becomes more visible, we will get there. It’s a huge task and this public acceptance category is our biggest challenge if we want to make it a success going forward.”
Prichard offered a different spin on the opening question, to work through some of the perspectives.
She said: “I’m out there in the public speaking about this all over the world and generally I have been met with quite a lot of excitement. While we talk about people having concerns and there being a hurdle for public acceptance, the other side of that coin is that there is a huge momentum of people being very excited about this technology and making this Jetsons future a reality.
“While there will be barriers in terms of acceptance, I think we shouldn’t underestimate people’s excitement.”
McDuffee then asked the panel what they think the industry should be conveying in the form of messaging to the future flying public about how these vehicles are certified and operated.
“I think it’s important to recognise that it’s not quite as simple as ‘are these vehicles safe’, Dietrich said.
“It more about the question of trust and that includes safety, but it’s bigger than that — it includes familiarity, what do I feel I’m getting out of this — things that are seamlessly irrelevant to safety. It’s these things that don’t actually impact that statistical safety of the vehicle, which are going to impact the trust.”
Whitaker added: “The expectation is that we’re going to be as safe as catching an airline flight, and that’s an incredibly high bar. But I think we know that if we don’t have that level of safety and meet that expectation, then the industry is going to be stifled from taking off.
“The challenge we have is that we’re dealing with a whole new set of technologies that don’t exist in the current system. The way we get there is to stay focused on safety as a system and as a result of the operation, not that everything is foolproof, but that you’ve got enough checks and balances, backup plans and redundancies so you can achieve a level of safety that is going to be acceptable to the general public.”
When asked about the safety perspective, Shilad agreed there are several questions that need to be answered and talked about how they will need to be communicated to an audience, whether it will be through education, stakeholders or test flights.
“I think it is engaging the public directly, and then finding opportunities to do so through events at local level to try and give people a feel for what that will look like. And then it’s having answers to the important questions like how will these aircraft be certified.
“But it’s also being able to highlight the efficiencies and the possibilities in terms of access for communities, medical care. It’s all an important part of the messaging to shift away from not just the challenges but also the opportunities and exciting developments that exist with this technology.”
Dietrich added to this point, saying: “It’s about balancing the adverse and the positive and that’s really front of mind for what we’re doing at CAMI. We don’t want to sugarcoat this. Even if the vehicles were perfectly quiet, there would still be people who would complain about noise if they didn’t want them in their communities. The noise would just become a scapegoat.
“We want to be upfront that there is the potential for negative impacts and that will not only allow us to build up that trust and mitigate them.”
To watch the whole discussion, visit https://www.bigmarker.com/nbaa/NBAA-News-Hour-Up-To-The-Task-Gaining-Trust-in-Advanced-Air-Mobility?bmid=da3c9939f53d
And to view a full schedule of NBAA webinars, visit https://nbaa.org/news/nbaa-news-hour/