Twelve recommendations which will form a plan of action for the possible integration of delivery drones and air taxis in Germany have been published, following the conclusion of joint research project by the Technische Universität Berlin and Wissenschaft im Dialog.

Over the past two years, the project – known as ‘Sky Limits’ – addressed the opportunities, challenges and risks associated with the possible use of this type of transportation in German cities.

It was funded as part of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research’s Innovation and Technology Analysis (ITA). Throughout 2019 and 2020, the project systematically identified and examined the opportunities and challenges presented by transport drones at the interface between technology assessment, futurology and social-scientific mobility research.

The recommendations are intended to spark a public debate regarding the use of lower airspace as a new traffic level. They cover a wide range of areas, including developing an air traffic management system prior to the introduction of drones on the basis of proactive policies, raising awareness among municipalities for the possible introduction of delivery drones and air taxis, and strengthening their capacities to organise such developments.

It also recognises the need to identify current public opposition to deliveries of consumer goods using drones. The recommendations are aimed at politicians, business, and urban and transport planners.

Dr. Robin Kellermann, project coordinator of Sky Limits at TU Berlin’s Chair of Work, Technology and Participation, said: “At the moment, the debate concerning the possible use of drones is primarily driven by the commercial sector. At the same time, there is a lack of scientific confirmation of the added values that manufacturers promise the population as a result of using this technology. Consequently, different perspectives and competing views need to be included in the debate.”

The 12 recommendations are:

  • The debate about the use of drones for deliveries and individual transport must become more objective and more detailed
  • The competing images of the future must be considered and negotiations must pay attention to these diverging images of the use of delivery drones and air taxis
  • The debate must be widened out to take in society as a whole, because drone flights are always public
  • The inclusion of the population must be formalised, for example by convening citizens’ assemblies
  • It must be recognised that, at present, the population is not in favour of the introduction of delivery drones and air taxis to deliver consumer goods and transport people
  • It must be appreciated that, currently, the implementation of drone technology is only acceptable in medical emergencies
  • The real added value of delivery drones and air taxis must be made more plausible for the population and the development of the technology must be guided by the needs of the population
  • Continuing in-depth technology assessment must be carried out on the potential use of delivery drones and air taxis
  • A conceptual guiding principle must be agreed which embeds the use of delivery drones and air taxis within a paradigm of sustainable and integrated transport.
  • Policy-making must be proactive and promote the development of clear air traffic management rules before drone technology is introduced
  • Local authorities must be alerted to the issue and equipped with greater structuring and management abilities for a potential introduction of delivery drones and air taxis
  • A German drone charter must be drafted to ensure that the use of airspace by delivery drones and air taxis is guided by the common good

Sky Limits also examined the level of public support for the introduction of transport drones. One representative public survey conducted in 2020 revealed 55 per cent of people living in Germany fundamentally reject the use of delivery drones, and 62 per cent when it comes to air taxis.

The majority can only imagine their use in emergencies, such as to deliver medicine (63 per cent) and transport the sick (65 per cent). As a result, the Sky Limits team recommends that future developments take account of the wishes expressed by society and restrict the use of transport drones to medical emergencies.

In their recommendations, the team calls for the public to be more closely involved in future discussions as it is ultimately they who will be directly affected by the introduction of delivery drones and air taxis.

Nico Dannenberger, project leader of Sky Limits at Wissenschaft im Dialog, added: “This is primarily the responsibility of political decision-makers. They now need to involve the public and local communities in discussions about the use of delivery drones and air taxis. One option for this would be citizen councils.”

According to another recommendation, social, economic and ecological consequences should be monitored on an ongoing basis. There also need to be clear and binding decisions regarding which rules and regulations would apply for the use of urban airspace as a new traffic level. 

You can read the final paper and its recommendations, by clicking here.