EventsFeatured

Designing edible drones with nutritional wings for rescue missions

Researchers at the Swiss Fed­er­al Insti­tute of Tech­nol­o­gy in Lau­sanne pre­sent­ed a paper ear­li­er this month describ­ing a drone that can boost its pay­load of food from 30 per­cent to 50 per­cent of its mass.

The IEEE/RSJ Inter­na­tion­al Con­fer­ence on Intel­li­gent Robots and Sys­tems (IROS) con­fer­ence in Kyoto was told how drones have been use­ful in unmanned trans­port mis­sions such as food and med­ical sup­ply deliv­ery to deliv­er life-sav­ing nutri­tion and med­i­cine to peo­ple in emer­gency sit­u­a­tions.

How­ev­er, com­mer­cial fixed wing drones can gen­er­al­ly only car­ry 10−30 per­cent of their own mass as pay­load so some struc­tures of a drone, such as the wings, could be made of edi­ble mate­ri­als, increas­ing its food-car­ry­ing mass ratio to 50 per­cent.

Should the edi­ble drone be left behind in the envi­ron­ment after per­form­ing its task in an emer­gency sit­u­a­tion, it will be more biodegrad­able than its non-edi­ble coun­ter­part and a flight-capa­ble pro­to­type can pro­vide 300 kcal and car­ry a pay­load of 80 grams of water.

Some com­pa­nies have already launched drone deliv­ery ser­vices to reduce the cost of deliv­er­ing small items on the last mile with mul­ti­ro­tor-type drones most com­mon­ly adopt­ed owing to their reli­a­bil­i­ty when hov­er­ing and manoeu­vring.

Drones can also be used to deliv­er life-sav­ing nutri­tion for peo­ple in emer­gency sit­u­a­tions, where approach­es for ground vehi­cles are dif­fi­cult. Con­se­quent­ly a fixed-wing drone is advan­ta­geous over a mul­ti­ro­tor-type drone.

In gen­er­al, the vol­ume of the wing occu­pies the largest part of a fixed-wing drone, so the edi­ble-wing has a wingspan of 678 mm. The remain­ing struc­tures like fuse­lage, actu­a­tors and elec­tron­ics use con­ven­tion­al mate­ri­als.

The wing should be strong enough to avoid bend­ing or mate­r­i­al fail­ure dur­ing flight, which favours foam such as expand­ed polypropy­lene (EPP) as a pri­ma­ry struc­tur­al mate­r­i­al for con­ven­tion­al fixed wing drones.

Rig­or­ous Sci­en­tif­ic Meth­ods
Using rig­or­ous sci­en­tif­ic meth­ods includ­ing Young’s Mod­u­lus tests, one of the most promis­ing can­di­dates was a puffed rice cook­ie, which is eas­i­ly machin­able by laser cut­ting and pro­duced by apply­ing high pres­sure to rice grains at high tem­per­a­ture.

A rice cook­ie has 3870 kcal per kg, low­er than the num­ber of calo­ries of some sweets over 5000 kcal/kg for choco­late and can­dy, but the den­si­ties of those sweets are five to eight times high­er than that of the rice cook­ie. Rice cook­ies offer a very sim­i­lar nutri­tion­al val­ue to oth­er com­mon foods such as oats, bar­ley and pas­ta but are less dense and hence more suit­able.

The typ­i­cal size of a rice cook­ie is around 70 mm (in length) while a wing has a much larg­er area, which means that mul­ti­ple rice cook­ies need to be laser cut and con­nect­ed by using an edi­ble adhe­sive.

Three types of edi­ble adhe­sives were test­ed: corn starch, choco­late, and gelatin to also pro­vide a small amount of nutri­ents to the edi­ble wing, and gelatin main­tained a strong bond until mate­r­i­al fail­ure of the rice cook­ie itself. The team con­clud­ed that it was stronger than both corn starch and choco­late, so gelatin was used as edi­ble adhe­sive through­out the study.

Hexag­o­nal Pat­tern
Wing load­ing is a crit­i­cal design para­me­ter in air­craft design, which impacts the lift coef­fi­cient, stall speed, and in the case of an edi­ble drone, nutri­tion that it is able to car­ry. A hexag­o­nal pat­tern was cho­sen to min­imise the addi­tion­al mass added by the edi­ble adhe­sive and glued with gelatin to cre­ate a pla­nar struc­ture, as illus­trat­ed below.

The entire wing sur­face was wrapped in plas­tic film and tape to pre­vent humid­i­ty dam­age and the mass of one full wingspan edi­ble wing was 100 grams includ­ing the pro­tec­tion film.

The fuse­lage was made of a 0.5 m long hol­low car­bon rod, with the elec­tron­ics locat­ed at the front for bal­ance dur­ing flight. A 300 kV brush­less motor was used to gen­er­ate thrust, while two micro ser­vo motors served as actu­a­tors for the ele­va­tor and rud­der of the tail wing.

Motors were remote­ly con­trolled by a stan­dard 2.4 GHz radio con­trol trans­mit­ter and receiv­er set. The edi­ble-winged drone was pow­ered by an 18.2 g Li-Po bat­tery (7.4 V, 260 mAh) for at least 10 min­utes of flight. The entire mass with­out pay­load was 200 grams.

Future devel­op­ment will focus on a nov­el way to store pay­loads, such as water, on an edi­ble drone, with­out sig­nif­i­cant­ly increas­ing the sur­face area exposed to air. Owing to its sim­ple fab­ri­ca­tion, mul­ti­ple edi­ble drones could be eas­i­ly deployed to deliv­er high­er amounts of nutri­tion.

Avatar photo

Jason Pritchard

Jason Pritchard is the Editor of eVTOL Insights. He holds a BA from Leicester's De Montfort University and has worked in Journalism and Public Relations for more than a decade. Outside of work, Jason enjoys playing and watching football and golf. He also has a keen interest in Ancient Egypt.

eVTOL Insights is part of the Industry Insights Group. Registered in the UK. Company No: 14395769