Varon Vehicles’ final think tank concludes with second discussion about vertiports
The eighth and final think tank led by Varon Vehicles finished with another brilliant conversation about vertiports in Latin America.
Since hosting its first session on August 4th, the company has brought industry stakeholders into conversations about the implementation of Urban Air Mobility in the region. Topics have included regulations, insurance, airspace integration and city implementation.
The latest one-hour discussion on October 14th featured Charles Clauser, Senior Director of Architecture and Urban Air Mobility Lead at PS&S Integrated Services, Donald Berchoff, CEO at TruWeather Solutions, Daniel Harris, who works in the Turboprops Engine Division at General Electric Aviation, Sergio Cecutta, Partner at SMG Consulting and Basil Yap, Vice President at Hovecon.
Topics discussed included Integration of Different Business Cases, Required Customer Services, Real Estate Infrastructure, Weather Systems, Energy Self Generation Systems and City Growth and Land Value Generation.
Introducing the session, Felipe Varon, CEO and Founder of Varon Vehicles, said: “We want to dig more into vertiports because it’s there where all the magic of Urban Air Mobility will happen. Let’s think about what we are trying to develop. What we are doing at Varon Vehicles is infrastructure networks, and those are a collection of vertiports connected with a fleet of air vehicles servicing between them.
“That’s an interesting proposal for cities when you compare them to for example, with metro systems or other existing mobility infrastructure, where you have metro stations, rail systems, linking them and trains servicing between them.
“When you compare the cost per mile of those systems and extending that to road systems and other physical mobility infrastructure, there is tremendous potential to break the status quo because in the case of urban air mobility we’re talking about virtual infrastructure. So it’s really about where we’re going to place our vertiports.”
Starting the conversation, Varon asked Clauser how we integrate all the various business cases — from air taxi and passenger transportation to freight-carrying logistics — into the vertiport idea. And whether we will have different business cases merging into a single vertiport, or different vertiports for different purposes.
Clauser said: “I’ve been thinking about this for a while and my projection is that we will see both scenarios, meaning that there will be individual vertiports that serve particular functions that are unique enough that they can stand alone and certainly there are going to be other vertiport facilities that can draw into and draw upon various service sectors that can serve the community both near and somewhat far with Urban Air Mobility.
“The placement of these vertiports, whether individual or shared use, can’t really happen without the approval of the communities in which they’re to be placed. The municipalities have to have the regulations in place themselves, maybe in the state or in Colombia, the various departments. On top of that we have to have an active airspace system that has been thoroughly vetted and approved.
“There are so many factors that are involved in the location and placement of a vertiport. It all starts with what is the mission? What is the original intent for the business enterprise that one is talking about, and from there we can develop a programme that is multi-faceted and looks at the local and municipal regulatory structure, zoning, site planning, public approval.”
Next to talk about the planning of vertiports around the different weather systems was Berchoff, who said: “One of the things I think about is what has been selected due to the infrastructure being there already for a vertiport.
“How does that parlay itself into weather patterns in areas…even if you think the weather is good, it may not be good in a specific spot to land an asset like this. How well are we planning, looking at how wind flow and wind conditions are the mean and where you want to place these things, and trying to plan out the weather where it makes sense.
“You’re not going to stop the weather but it’s all about resiliency: it isn’t just stronger engines, better flight control systems or sensors on the aircraft that can measure turbulence, it’s about management of the weather.
“The second thing I think about is the lack of data. Most of the instruments we use are at airports; they’re certified and expensive. We’ve got to figure out a way to change the paradigm on how you certify weather data. If you get the placement right, you’re still going to have the weather. Then you worry about the general routes that you want to take, which we need to think about how they will be affected by turbulence.
“Are you going to have that predictability five hours in advance if the weather isn’t behaving?”
Giving his perspective from a turbine point of view, Harris said: “Having autonomous aircraft in flight controls has become a very significant certification challenge as look at next-gen air traffic control in FAA and certification systems for the navigation and control systems on the aircraft, and the propulsion systems that integrate.Autonomy is a big aspect that we’re following, the OEMs which are studying that and we’re very interested in understanding those solutions.
“As we get into some of the turbine aspects, many of us are following the lead of some of the government initiatives in Europe and the US for going carbon neutral. And there’s a certain sense of whether the conservation requirements are going to be driving wholesale changes in propulsion systems and aircraft that drive us to be more electric.
“In the industry, there are many discussions and it’s not a clear road map. It’s a very open discussion. Near term, I see in the next five years using jet fuel and hydrocarbons, and using electrification, battery systems, to make aircraft 30 per cent more efficient. That’s what the industry seems to be pointing us to do.”
Cecutta spoke about his perspective on the vertiport solution, and said: “I think it’s very important to think about the city in which the vertiport goes as well. Sitting in the USA, we have a very US-centric view of the world. We wrote a note about the type of vehicles that might suit emerging countries in Latin America and how they might be different from the ones they were designing for the US. That will also dictate the shape of the vertiports.
“What kind of energy sources will we need to have there? Might it be better not to have fully electric because of the impact on the grid? What is the community acceptance, is it going to be a modern building or something that merges more with the rest of the city? And where will it go, will be in the middle of the city or put on a freeway, and is noise important?
“We also need to understand the business model. How are these vertiports going to live? Is it going to be a landing spot, part of a shopping mall, and whether we like it or not, COVID-19 has had a lasting impact and it all depends on how long it takes to get a vaccine.
“I see a positive and negative point: working remotely can lead to people living further away from where they work if there is no congestion, but at the same time, if they don’t need to go to the office, would this need for transportation be reduced? We see a lot of different moving pieces, but the most important thing is when we think about these vertiports, let’s be clear that their design needs to be specific to the city specific to the ecosystem.”
Finishing off the first part of the conversation, Yap said: “If we’re looking at this digital network and highways in the sky, what’s really exciting is that you can manipulate those to reduce the impact to the city. So you can move routes based on things like weather, community acceptance and engagement.
“Do we want these routes consistently over disadvantaged neighbourhoods? No, we’d probably want to make sure there’s equity in the impacts. What we’re hearing about noise impact is that it’s not as bad as traditional aviation.”
“What we have found is that with these drone operations we’ve started in cities, they’re very quiet as well especially with all the other noises going on. We have hospital and healthcare campuses where drones are flying in between now, and no-one even looks up unless a helicopter flies in and is delivering a patient, because that is a much louder noise.”
“The vertiports are the connection points and one thing which is important for transportation organisations to think about is that connectivity. So once I get off an air taxi and I need to get to my final destination, what is my next connection point? Is that a ride share, micro mobility such as a scooter, or am I walking? So you need to ensure that the vertiports are in close proximity to high travel areas.
“Another important point is protecting them. So if we have a vertiport that is close to the ground or in some elevated area, we don’t need to protect that through zoning and building codes to ensure no-one builds a 70-storey hotel next to it, which would make that vertiport useless. There are some unique opportunities, but we also need to look at these other questions which are going to rise about protecting that infrastructure and vertiports once they’re established.”
Varon Vehicles will be sharing its next steps with the industry, as part of a three-day virtual summit called Skyscraper. It will take place from November 18th-20.
You can watch this think tank, and the rest of the sessions, by visiting www.varonvehicles.com/skyscraper.

