FeaturedNews

AirIndex and Aeroberm™ Partner to Address the Hidden Infrastructure Crisis Facing Advanced Air Mobility

AirIndex and Aer­oberm™ — a Sky­portz Aus­tralia com­pa­ny — will work togeth­er to address what they say is one of the least-dis­cussed but most con­se­quen­tial bar­ri­ers to Advanced Air Mobil­i­ty deploy­ment; the gap between where heli­copters land today and where eVTOL air­craft can safe­ly land tomor­row.

The part­ner­ship will com­bine AirIndex’s author­i­ta­tive audit of U.S. ver­ti­cal-lift infra­struc­ture with Aer­oberm™ — the world’s first patent­ed mod­u­lar ver­ti­pad sys­tem.

The Data Prob­lem

AirIndex’s inde­pen­dent analy­sis of the FAA’s Air­port Mas­ter Record — the author­i­ta­tive fed­er­al data­base of U.S. heli­ports — has found four sys­tem­at­ic fail­ures in the nation­al land­ing infra­struc­ture record.

Of the 5,647 reg­is­tered U.S. heli­ports, 98.5 per­cent have nev­er been inde­pen­dent­ly field-inspect­ed. The own­ers sim­ply sup­plied the data. More than 1,121 hos­pi­tal heli­pads oper­at­ing today have no FAA reg­is­tra­tion on file with­in a nau­ti­cal mile.

Facil­i­ties have moved — for exam­ple, from ground to rooftop — while the fed­er­al record updat­ed only par­tial­ly, leav­ing record­ed ele­va­tions, approach geom­e­try, and obstruc­tion data qui­et­ly drift­ing from phys­i­cal real­i­ty. And in some cas­es, the coor­di­nates are sim­ply wrong: one Nashville heli­port has been plot­ted 48.5 nau­ti­cal miles from its true loca­tion since 1979.

The con­se­quence of these fail­ures has been man­age­able in the heli­copter era, where pilots exer­cise direct judg­ment about land­ing sur­faces. It becomes acute in the eVTOL era, where auto­mat­ed and semi-auto­mat­ed flight oper­a­tions assume the land­ing sur­face is exact­ly where the record says it is, exact­ly the size the record says it is, and clear of obstruc­tions.

The Size Prob­lem

Even where the record is accu­rate, the infra­struc­ture itself presents a fun­da­men­tal chal­lenge. Of the 5,594 reg­is­tered U.S. heli­ports with record­ed pad dimen­sions, the medi­an pad size is just 48 feet.

Under FAA Engi­neer­ing Brief 105A — the cur­rent guid­ance doc­u­ment for eVTOL land­ing areas — a com­pli­ant final approach and take­off (FATO) area requires a load bear­ing area approx­i­mate­ly dou­ble the air­craft ref­er­ence dimen­sion, putting typ­i­cal min­i­mums at 100 feet and above.

More than half of all reg­is­tered U.S. heli­ports are, on the basis of record­ed dimen­sions alone, too small for eVTOL oper­a­tions under cur­rent cri­te­ria. And those dimen­sions sit on top of a record that is 98.5 per­cent unin­spect­ed.

The assump­tion that exist­ing heli­pads will sim­ply become ver­ti­ports as air taxis arrive is not sup­port­ed by the data. The infra­struc­ture tran­si­tion from heli­copter-era pads to eVTOL-capa­ble ver­ti­pads requires active engi­neer­ing — not just reg­u­la­to­ry redes­ig­na­tion.

Alan Holmes, Founder & CEO, Ver­ti­cal Data Group / AirIndex, said: “The fed­er­al land­ing record was built for a world where pilots looked out the win­dow and made judg­ment calls. Auto­mat­ed eVTOL flight assumes the record is right: the loca­tion, the dimen­sions, the obstruc­tions. Our analy­sis shows it fre­quent­ly isn’t. This part­ner­ship means we move from mea­sur­ing the gap to clos­ing it.”

The Down­wash Prob­lem

Size is not the only issue. eVTOL air­craft, just like heli­copters gen­er­ate aero­dy­nam­ic forces on the land­ing sur­face in the form of down­wash and out­wash. Mul­ti-rotor eVTOL con­fig­u­ra­tions have been shown to pro­duce down­wash and out­wash of greater veloc­i­ties that extends sig­nif­i­cant­ly beyond the aircraft’s land­ing area foot­print, cre­at­ing haz­ard zones for ground crew, pas­sen­gers, and bystanders.

The FAA’s own full-scale out­wash mea­sure­ments, con­duct­ed in Decem­ber 2024, con­firmed veloc­i­ties at the pad perime­ter exceed­ing the 34.5 mph thresh­old iden­ti­fied in Engi­neer­ing Brief 105A as the thresh­old for sig­nif­i­cant haz­ard.

Ver­ti­port designs that sim­ply repaint a heli­pad “H” and call it a ver­ti­pad “V” are not solv­ing the prob­lem — they are inher­it­ing it.

The Aer­oberm™ Solu­tion

Aer­oberm™ is the world’s first patent­ed mod­u­lar ver­ti­pad sys­tem, specif­i­cal­ly engi­neered to address the three tech­ni­cal bar­ri­ers that have blocked urban ver­ti­port approval glob­al­ly: rotor down­wash and out­wash haz­ard at the land­ing sur­face, rotor noise ampli­fi­ca­tion in ground effect, and lithi­um-ion bat­tery ther­mal run­away fire safe­ty.

The Aer­oberm frac­tal pan­el sys­tem — val­i­dat­ed by Large Eddy Sim­u­la­tion CFD research con­duct­ed by Swin­burne Uni­ver­si­ty of Tech­nol­o­gy, Aus­tralia— dis­si­pates rotor wake ener­gy approx­i­mate­ly 90 per­cent faster than flat tar­mac, sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduc­ing out­wash veloc­i­ties at the pad perime­ter and the haz­ard zone around land­ing oper­a­tions. The sys­tem is mod­u­lar and deploy­able on exist­ing con­crete sur­faces with­out bespoke con­struc­tion, mak­ing it a path­way to retro­fit exist­ing heli­pads that are phys­i­cal­ly ade­quate but aero­dy­nam­i­cal­ly unsuit­able for eVTOL under cur­rent safe­ty cri­te­ria.

For exist­ing heli­pads that fall short of eVTOL dimen­sion­al require­ments, Aer­ober­m’s mod­u­lar sys­tem may offer a viable retro­fit path­way — pro­vid­ed the under­ly­ing struc­ture can car­ry the load and air­space is clear — deliv­er­ing com­pli­ant infra­struc­ture at a speed and cost that bespoke con­struc­tion can­not match.

Clem New­ton-Brown, Founder and CEO of Sky­portz Aus­tralia and cre­ator of the Aer­oberm™ patent, said: “The AirIndex research makes some­thing explic­it that the indus­try has been danc­ing around. The exist­ing heli­pad record is not a reli­able foun­da­tion for eVTOL plan­ning.

“And even where pads are real, inspect­ed, and cor­rect­ly record­ed, most of them are the wrong size and none of them are engi­neered for the aero­dy­nam­ic real­i­ty of mul­ti-rotor eVTOL. Aer­oberm was designed specif­i­cal­ly for this gap.

He added: “The part­ner­ship with AirIndex means we can now iden­ti­fy which exist­ing facil­i­ties are can­di­dates for retro­fit, what engi­neer­ing inter­ven­tion each one needs, and deliv­er a mod­u­lar solu­tion that meets the emerg­ing reg­u­la­to­ry stan­dard at an afford­able cost”

Indus­try Per­spec­tive

Rex Alexan­der, Pres­i­dent of Five Alpha LLC, said: “The ver­ti­cal flight data integri­ty issue is not unique to the Unit­ed States; sim­i­lar chal­lenges have been observed in numer­ous coun­tries around the world. It is also not an FAA-gen­er­at­ed prob­lem. The FAA has not been grant­ed com­pre­hen­sive fed­er­al over­sight author­i­ty over most pri­vate-use avi­a­tion facil­i­ties com­pa­ra­ble to its author­i­ty over cer­tifi­cat­ed pub­lic-use air­ports. As a result, there has his­tor­i­cal­ly been lim­it­ed fund­ing, staffing, and reg­u­la­to­ry incen­tive to sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly ver­i­fy and main­tain accu­rate infra­struc­ture data for thou­sands of pri­vate-use ver­ti­cal flight facil­i­ties.

“A sig­nif­i­cant reg­u­la­to­ry gap exists because many pri­vate-use facil­i­ties that sup­port com­mer­cial avi­a­tion activ­i­ties, includ­ing hos­pi­tal heli­ports and oth­er facil­i­ties sup­port­ing com­mer­cial air oper­a­tions, are not sub­ject to com­pre­hen­sive fed­er­al infra­struc­ture stan­dards or rou­tine inspec­tion pro­grams. Con­se­quent­ly, the FAA gen­er­al­ly lacks direct author­i­ty to com­pel pri­vate-use facil­i­ty own­ers to com­ply with FAA heli­port design guid­ance and infra­struc­ture stan­dards unless spe­cif­ic reg­u­la­to­ry or oper­a­tional cir­cum­stances apply.

“Until such time as Con­gress pro­vides addi­tion­al statu­to­ry author­i­ty and fund­ing to address these issues, the FAA’s abil­i­ty to sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly improve the accu­ra­cy, com­plete­ness, and ver­i­fi­ca­tion of ver­ti­cal flight infra­struc­ture data will remain lim­it­ed.”

The Part­ner­ship

The AirIndex–Aeroberm part­ner­ship com­bines AirIndex’s prove­nance-anchored, mul­ti-source audit­ed data­base of U.S. ver­ti­cal-lift infra­struc­ture with Aer­ober­m’s mod­u­lar ver­ti­pad engi­neer­ing to offer a sys­tem­at­ic retro­fit assess­ment and deploy­ment capa­bil­i­ty for exist­ing heli­pad oper­a­tors, hos­pi­tal sys­tems, air­port author­i­ties, and AAM oper­a­tors seek­ing to estab­lish ver­ti­port net­works on exist­ing infra­struc­ture.

The part­ner­ship will ini­tial­ly focus on the Unit­ed States mar­ket, where the AirIndex dataset pro­vides full nation­al cov­er­age, before extend­ing to inter­na­tion­al mar­kets.

Avatar photo

Jason Pritchard

Jason Pritchard is the Editor of eVTOL Insights. He holds a BA from Leicester's De Montfort University and has worked in Journalism and Public Relations for more than a decade. Outside of work, Jason enjoys playing and watching football and golf. He also has a keen interest in Ancient Egypt.

eVTOL Insights is part of the Industry Insights Group. Registered in the UK. Company No: 14395769